Reviewer: Mengqi Zhang
I am in Group J and reviewing the project from Group K.
Overview
Pro: introduction is well written and concise. Two citation are present.
Con: the info on hosting platform is absent. Should be an easy job to add this info in the revision stage.
Learning Theory and Design
Pro: the whole paragraph is well written.
Con: no obvious shortcomings
Learning Context and Inclusive Design
Pro: the target learners are well defined in the first paragraph.
Con: Consider adding more illustration in the second paragraph. Admittedly, the second paragraph displayed a causal relation between the target learners and the plans to be implemented. Consider illustrating how these plans fulfill the needs of inclusive design. For instance, as for learners’ abilities, illustration how these plans fulfill the needs for both top students and average students. Another consideration may involve with learning style. How do the groups of learning styles A, B, and C all benefit from this learning resource?
Learning Outcomes
Pro: learning outcomes are defined precisely.
Con: no obvious shortcomings
Commentary about each topic and activity
Pro: contents and practice problems are present and well-designed. I tested the google-form and it functions well.
Con: As of the evening of 06/17, the section of “selection process” is not finished. Time to decide to do it or undo it.
Assessment
Pro: very detailed
Con: please correct me if I miss something: in sub-section of “summative assessments”, each module quiz is planned to consist of 15-20 problem. But in the previous component “commentary”, there are only 5 problems approximately for each module. Additionally, are there any entries for lab report and final exam? (AKA, what do lab report and final exam look like? How could learners access the lab report and final exam? )
Rationale
Pro: precise and concise
Con: no obvious shortcoming
Leave a Reply